A year of analysis, countless staff presentations to congestion management
agencies and other partner organizations, community meetings in all nine counties, and
ongoing internal discussions have gone into refining MTC's Transportation Blueprint for the
21st Century.
In pursuit of the Blueprint, planners have been taking a fresh look at the fraying
fabric of the Bay Area's transportation network and suggesting ways to mend and augment it
-- from new rail lines to highway improvements to a regionwide network of express buses.
How many of the projects will emerge as real contenders, however, depends not only on local
players but also on legislators in Sacramento ensuring that there's money to pay for
whatever options are selected.
In the second part of this two-part series, we examine the prospects for financing the
region's urgent transportation priorities. A hot topic in the state Legislature in 1999,
funding is likely to remain on the front burner in the current year. Key among the
transportation funding bills that were unsuccessful last time around and expected to be
re-introduced in this session is one that would make it easier for local jurisdictions to
finance transportation projects through new or extended county sales tax measures.
Although currently there is a state budget surplus, and more federal money has been
available recently than in the past, the region faces a future in which fewer resources are
at hand to underwrite growing transportation needs. "Just as the counties' sales taxes are
expiring, the amount of money needed to rehabilitate our aging infrastructure is
increasing," said MTC Deputy Executive Director Steve Heminger. "We're living off the
investments in transportation made by our parents and grandparents, and not doing anything
for our kids."
Prospects for additional moneys for transportation seemed to look up when Gov. Gray
Davis unveiled his $88 billion state budget proposal for fiscal year 2000-01, designating
$7.5 billion for transportation purposes, $3 billion of which he described as new funds. He
also singled out several rail projects serving Silicon Valley that would benefit from extra
general tax revenue generated by the state's strong economy. While the largesse from the
state's General Fund is good news, MTC's Heminger noted that the reported $3 billion in
"new" gas tax money would be generated simply by lengthening the State Transportation
Improvement Program (STIP) from four years to seven, thereby tapping into already expected
revenues.
Keeping Projects Moving
Any new package of funding bills is expected to include expedited project delivery as a
component, and reducing project delays will continue to be an aim of MTC's legislative
agenda as well. During the 1999 legislative session, Assembly Bill 1012, authored by
Assemblymember Tom Torlakson (Antioch) and signed into law as an urgency statute by the
governor, provides a push for the speedy completion of projects by imposing a three-year
limit on the use of certain federal transportation funds by local agencies.
The governor's "transportation initiative," as unveiled in the budget, proposed tighter
deadlines and potential penalties for local agencies that fail to spend federal
transportation dollars quickly. His assertion that such agencies would forfeit the money to
the state -- an amount he pegged at $1.7 billion -- made newspaper headlines. "We agree
that projects need to be completed in a timely fashion," said Therese McMillan, MTC's
manager of Funding and External Affairs. "AB 1012 addresses just that issue. We need to
give the bill a chance to work."
Clearing the Way for Local Initiatives
While spending existing money efficiently is vital, it still leaves a large number of
transportation needs unfunded, McMillan noted. For this reason, MTC supports Senate
Constitutional Amendment 3, authored by John Burton (San Francisco), president pro tempore
of the state Senate. SCA 3 would allow a majority vote of the electorate in each county --
rather than the current two-thirds -- to impose or extend a half-cent sales tax for funding
local transportation projects (see Q & A and chart below). It
would provide new money that, unlike limited federal funds with complex spending
regulations, could be more immediately available to use.
|
The Half-Pennies Add Up
Total Bay Area Transportation Sales Tax Revenues: $7.2
billion
(1985-2010, in current dollars)
The half-cent transportation sales taxes approved by voters in five Bay
Area counties (Alameda, Contra Costa, San Francisco, San Mateo and Santa
Clara) generate hefty revenues for a range of transportation improvements
over the terms of the measures.
Sources: County transportation sales tax expenditure plans,
MTC estimates.
Chart concept: Joe Curley
|
Complicating the passage of SCA 3 in the new legislative session, however, is the
governor's statement in January that he would oppose the bill as currently written. MTC's
Heminger said, "It doesn't sound like he is shutting the door. If he wants to suggest
changes to the measure, that leaves the door open."
SCA 3 is, in fact, the centerpiece of MTC's legislative agenda for the coming year. "MTC
is an active participant in the growing statewide coalition to push SCA 3 forward in 2000,"
said Heminger. The coalition includes the League of California Cities and the California
State Association of Counties, as well as numerous business groups and, perhaps most
notably, the California Taxpayers Association.
In the five Bay Area counties that already have half-cent sales taxes for transportation
in place, annual sales tax revenues currently exceed each county's base share of state and
federal money from the STIP (see graph below). Unless these sales
taxes are renewed by voters, however, all would expire by 2010.
"It will be important for congestion management agencies, cities and counties to let
their representatives in Sacramento know that a funding mechanism to allow local voters the
option to tax themselves is needed as soon as possible," said MTC's McMillan.
Refining the Blueprint
While pursuing funding issues, MTC also has been putting the finishing touches on the
Blueprint. With performance factors getting close attention in the Legislature (see
"Legislative Hearings" story), planners are looking at
performance criteria as one way to make the difficult decisions about which Blueprint
projects best meet the region's needs. (See the October-November 1999 issue of Transactions for a list of
potential projects.)
Another way to look at Blueprint projects would be through the lens of specific desired
policy outcomes for the region as a whole, such as reducing the maintenance shortfall for
local streets and roads, and improving regional transit coordination. Still another
approach would be to narrow the scope of the Blueprint to a discrete set of promising
projects that are agreed upon through regional consensus.
In order to help determine the final shape of the Blueprint, MTC is launching a
telephone poll in February and surveying local officials, augmenting the comments it has
already received from the region's transportation-related agencies and the public. A
comprehensive report is expected to be issued in April.
"We need to be ready with a regional plan for putting available moneys to their best
use, whatever legislation comes out of this session of the state Legislature that would
help pay for our critical transportation needs," said MTC's McMillan.
-- Réka Goode
A comparison of the revenues generated by half-cent sales taxes for transportation with
those contributed by the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) -- two funding
sources that are primarily oriented toward system expansion -- shows the importance to the
Bay Area of the county-level sales tax measures. In each of the five counties with a
special transportation sales tax in place, the proceeds from this levy exceed the county's
share of funds from the STIP.
Sources: State Transportation Improvement Program, MTC estimates.
Chart concept: Joe Curley
Contents
|