|
Home
About MTC
News
Jobs & Contracts
Meetings & Events
Get Involved
Services
Library
Maps & Data
Funding
Planning
Projects
Legislation
Links
|
 |
Safety Toolbox: Engineering |
Previous tool / Next tool 
Index: alphabetical / cost / crash type / target population
European pedestrian and bicycle crossing improvements
|
|
European-style crossings that can be applied at mid-block crossings.
Pelican (Pedestrian light controlled) crossings are traffic signals used to control traffic at mid-block crosswalks. When activated, approaching drivers see a solid red light while the pedestrian is crossing and a flashing yellow during the pedestrian clearance interval; and crossing pedestrians see a red man/solid green man/flashing green man signal. Pelican crossings may be staggered, providing separate traffic signals for each direction of vehicular travel and allowing pedestrians to interrupt traffic flow by direction.
Puffin (Pedestrian user friendly intelligent) crossings are similar in construction to Pelican crossings but have different operations and timing requirements. Pedestrian signals are installed above the pedestrian push buttons, allowing pedestrians to see the indications and traffic at the same time. Supplemental automated pedestrian detection also allows for the pedestrian phase to be extended while pedestrians are still in the crosswalk.
Toucan (Two can cross) crossings have the same form of vehicular detection as the Pelican and Puffin crossings and normally the same form of pedestrian on-crossing detector as the Puffin crossing. They are meant to allow both pedestrians and cyclists to cross; as such, they use signal heads that combine both pedestrian and bicycle indications.
Most installations of the Pelican, Puffin, and Toucan crossings are accompanied by Zigzag markings that are placed in advance of the marked crosswalks. The standard pattern is four sets of markings on each approach. The markings signal a ìno parking or passing zone to motorists. |
| objective |
To provide a controlled crossing for pedestrians and bicyclists at mid-block locations. |
| applications |
Pelican and Puffin crossings are used in the UK, Australia, and other countries with strong links to the UK's approach to traffic engineering. Toucan Crossings are used in the UK and in Tucson, Arizona. Zigzag approach markings are required at most types of pedestrian crossings in the UK to restrict parking and passing. |
| target population |
All Pedestrians, All Bicyclists, Motorists |
| crash type |
Pedestrian R/W Violation-Non-Intersection, Pedestrian Violation-Non-Intersection, Other Hazardous Movement, Excessive Speed, Pedestrian R/W Violation-Intersection, Pedestrian Violation-Intersection |
| advantages |
- Provides a controlled crossing
- Toucan crossings provide a controlled crossing for both pedestrians and bicyclists
- Zigzag markings reduce the problem of parked vehicles blocking sight distance
|
| disadvantages |
- Cost of installation is significant for each crossing, comparable to a mid-block crossing
- There is some disruption to traffic flow, which can be minimized if the mid-block signal is part of a coordinated system
There may not be traffic surges to give an audible cue about crossing intervals, so accessible pedestrian signals with a locator tone must be provided to inform visually impaired pedestrians that actuation of a signal is required to cross the major street and to indicate onset of the WALK interval; this increases the cost
|
| pointers |
Significant enforcement effort would initially be required to make the zig-zag markings effective until the visual cue becomes sufficient to deter passing or parking within the zigzag zone. |
| cost |
Pelican, Puffin, and Toucan Crossings-High, $50,000-$75,000, depending on the width of the street, the length of mast-arms, and whether or not center island and landscaping are installed. Operation costs are estimated to be $4,000 per year. Zigzag markings- Medium, $1,000-$2,000 per installation, depending on the materials used. |
| responsibility |
Public Works Department |
| further reading |
1) Davies, D. Research, Development, and Implementation of Pedestrian Safety Facilities in the United Kingdom. Federal Highway Administration, Turner-Fairbanks Highway Research Center, FHWA-RD-99-089, Virginia, 1999.
(2) Lalani, N. Are Pelican Crossings Safe? Greater London Intelligence Bulletin, December 1975.
(3) Audible and Tactile Signals at Pelican Crossings. Traffic Advisory Unit Leaflet 4/91. London, UK: Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions, November 1991.
(4) Toucan, an Un-segregated Crossing for Pedestrians and Bicyclists. Traffic Advisory Leaflet 10/93. London, UK: Traffic Advisory Unit, Department of Transport, The Stationery Office, 1993;
(5) Toucan Crossing Development. Traffic Advisory Leaflet 4/98. London, UK: Traffic Advisory Unit, Department of Transport, The Stationery Office, 1998.
(6) The Zebra Pedestrian Crossings Regulations 1971. London, UK: Department of the Environment, September 1971;
(7) The Design of Pedestrian Crossings. Local Transport Note 2/95. London, UK: Department of Transportation, The Welsh Office, The Scottish Office, The Department of the Environment for Northern Ireland, The Stationery Office, April 1995. |
| examples |
City of Tucson, Department of Transportation;
London, England, Greater London Council Road Safety Unit and the Transport and Road Research Laboratory. |
| related tools |
Mid-block Signalized Crossings, Pedestrian Refuge Islands, High-Intensity Activated Crosswalk, Bicycle Boulevard, Automated Pedestrian Detection |
Index: alphabetical / cost / crash type / target population
Previous tool / Next tool 
|