Search title image

Bicycles/Pedestrians

Safety Toolbox: Engineering


  Previous tool  /  Next tool  

Index: alphabetical / cost / crash type / target population

Signal timing for pedestrians
Several applications can be applied to signal timing to enhance pedestrian safety. 

Slower Signal Timing:  At intersections without pedestrian signals, timing should be implemented such that the sum of the minimum green and clearance times is no less than the minimum time required for pedestrians to traverse a crossing at four feet per second.  With or without the presence of pedestrian signals, pedestrian timings may be adjusted for slower walking rates of 2.5 to 3.5 feet per second, such as for young children, disabled, or elderly pedestrians. 

Leading Pedestrian Phases:  To minimize conflicts between pedestrians and motorists, traffic signals may be programmed for leading pedestrian phases, which provide pedestrians with a few seconds of lead time prior to the onset of the associated vehicle phase.  The lead time allows pedestrians to be in the crosswalk when the green interval for the associated vehicle phase begins, making them more visible to motorists. 

Exclusive Pedestrian Phases:  At locations with high volumes of pedestrians, traffic signals may be programmed for an exclusive pedestrian phase (also known as an all-pedestrian phase, pedestrian scramble, or scramble phase), which provides an all-red indication to all vehicular traffic.  In such cases, pedestrians may be allowed to cross the intersection diagonally and right turns on red may have to be restricted during the scramble phase.

objective To provide adequate crossing times or to minimize conflicts between pedestrians and motorists at signalized intersections.
applications Walk rates of less than four feet per second are ideal for signalized intersections near elementary schools, middle schools, facilities for the disabled, and senior developments.  Leading pedestrian phases are ideal for signalized intersections with a high incidence of conflicts between pedestrians and turning vehicles.  Pedestrian scramble phases are ideal for signalized intersections with very high pedestrian volumes.
target population Elderly Pedestrians, Disabled Pedestrians, Young Pedestrians, All Pedestrians, Motorists
crash type Pedestrian R/W Violation-Intersection, Pedestrian Violation-Intersection, Traffic Signals and Signs
advantages
  • Low-cost initiative
  • Makes signalized intersections more pedestrian friendly
  • Reduces conflicts between pedestrians and turning vehicles
disadvantages
  • All measures would tend to increase the signal cycle length, thereby potentially increasing delays to pedestrians waiting to cross the street. Pedestrians may tend to start crossing before the WALK interval begins.
  • For leading pedestrian phases, there may be no traffic surges to audibly mark the beginning of the crossing interval, so accessible pedestrian signals may have to be installed to provide crossing cues for visually impaired pedestrians, thereby increasing the cost of this treatment.
  • For all-pedestrian phases, both motorists and pedestrians may initially be confused by the atypical signal operation
pointers Supplemental measures, including educational campaigns, educational signs, special regulatory signs, and/or countdown signals, may also be advisable for pedestrian scrambles, given that they are not typical in the Bay Area. Both the leading pedestrian phase and all-pedestrian phase have been known to increase pedestrian perception of safety.
cost Medium, $1,000 or more, depending on the capabilities of the controller at the intersection and the ability to add additional phases.
responsibility Public Works Department
further reading

Retting, R., J. Van Houten, C. Farmer, and R. Van Houten. Field Evaluation of a Leading Pedestrian Phase at Three Urban Intersections. Washington, DC: Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, April 1997.

Fleck, J. Pedestrian Head Start Signal Timing. Presented at ITE District 6 Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, 2000.

Hannan, T.J. Solving Pedestrian Conflicts with Special Signal Phasing. In 1987 Compendium of Technical Papers, 146-149. Washington, DC: ITE, 1987.

Zegeer, C.V., Opiela, K.S., and Cynechi, M.J., Pedestrian Signalization Alternatives [Final Report No. FHWA/RD-83/102], Federal Highway Administration, (July 1985).

examples City and County of San Francisco, Department of Parking and Traffic, and City of Oakland, Public Works Agency for pedestrian scrambles.
related tools Hawk Crossings, Pedestrian-Prompting Signs, Countdown Signals

Index: alphabetical / cost / crash type / target population

  Previous tool  /  Next tool